Proposal work is high-value
and badly automated.
Teams spend hours hunting old responses, gathering source material, mapping requirements, rewriting near-identical answers, and coordinating review across business, technical, legal, and security stakeholders.
AI-assisted workflows can help — but only if they're designed around security, accuracy, and human review. That's the problem we're working on.
Generic AI tools are a poor fit for proposal work.
Proposal teams routinely handle material that cannot be treated casually — and speed is only useful if the process stays controlled.
- Customer requirements and contract language
- Pricing context and past performance detail
- Technical architecture documentation
- Security and compliance evidence
- Proprietary business information and internal strategy
- Regulated or controlled information
Used carelessly, that content creates confidentiality, accuracy, and governance problems that surface later — in a diligence review, an audit, or a customer escalation.
What we're building.
The goal is not to replace expert judgment. It is to remove repetitive work, improve organization, and help teams produce better drafts with review and control intact.
01Source material and response library
Organize past responses, evidence, and reusable content so the team stops rediscovering the same answers.
02Requirement mapping and response planning
Map incoming requirements to existing content and identify genuine gaps before drafting starts.
03Human-reviewed draft preparation
Draft responses prepared for review rather than published automatically. Review is a required step, not an optional one.
04Security questionnaire support
Consistent, defensible answers to recurring security questionnaires, backed by the evidence that supports them.
05Secure workflow governance
Controls around who can access what, what leaves the environment, and what gets logged.
These are developing workflows, not a mature commercial platform. We'd rather say that plainly than discover it together mid-engagement.
If your team is buried in proposal work, we'd like to hear about it.
We're looking for conversations with organizations that respond to RFPs, RFIs, and security questionnaires and cannot treat the underlying information casually.
Get a clearer starting point.
Thirty minutes to see whether an assessment is the right next move. If it isn't, we'll tell you that on the call.